Black-Cell.net

  • December 03, 2023, 12:27:41 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - thewall86

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 72
1
General Discussion / Re: is this thing on?
« on: June 11, 2020, 02:54:17 AM »

2
General Discussion / Re: is this thing on?
« on: May 14, 2020, 06:55:04 PM »
hehe

3
General Discussion / Re: Colbert for pres!
« on: October 24, 2007, 11:49:10 AM »
No, no, no. They just want government back to its true purpose - protecting our rights and protecting our nation. Libertarians rock. Ron Paul rocks.

4
General Discussion / Re: -BiO-Swift4Orr and -BiO-Anubis_Orr
« on: October 22, 2007, 10:51:03 PM »
yay <3 dante :-D

5
General Discussion / Re: -BiO-Swift4Orr and -BiO-Anubis_Orr
« on: October 22, 2007, 04:08:05 PM »


LOL WUTS GOIN ON IN THIS THREAD

6
General Discussion / Re: Comparing Christendom and Islam
« on: October 17, 2007, 05:49:12 PM »
when that happens, press the "insert" key

7
General Discussion / Re: Comparing Christendom and Islam
« on: October 17, 2007, 05:40:30 PM »
As for religion there was a priest who hade been for for a very long time at my old school and around that area he was liked alot and respected alot then one day he got caught doing stuff to children how is that religion that may has been the act of one person but mabye if it wasnt for religion he wouldnt of done that shit.

+Religon is bawls imo and doesn't help at all people pray for stuff and crap happens

and failing R.E is the way to go my target grade is F lolololol coz boring so sleep

And now... in English?


*that's the worst argument I've ever heard. A man is a child molestor... surely that's caused by the religion which in no way condones such an act. Are you fucking serious?

8
General Discussion / Re: Colbert for pres!
« on: October 17, 2007, 05:37:20 PM »
Bush is no conservative. He's one of, if not the biggest spender in American history. Conservatives aren't bad ;)  It's that whole war-mongering/stripping-of-rights thing the so called "conservative" Republican party seems to be all about that annoys me.

9
General Discussion / Re: Colbert for pres!
« on: October 17, 2007, 08:46:51 AM »
Oh shi-

He better renounce it soon before he ends up winning... I'd almost guarantee he'd win if he actually ran...

10
General Discussion / Re: post your desktop
« on: October 17, 2007, 08:45:37 AM »
Needs less Companion Cube.

Also, I change my background like everyday because I can't ever decide amongst the awesomeness that is contained within my wallpaper folder. Clean desktop though :)


11
General Discussion / Re: Comparing Christendom and Islam
« on: October 17, 2007, 07:31:48 AM »
^
and feed the hungry, clothe the poor, provide solace for millions

you dont have to like religion, but if it comforts someone, its a dick move to bash it

The idiocy that enabled those people to kill in the name of religion runs dangerously parallel to the idiocy that enables you to bash it. Neither can occur if one didn't judge another on something as irrelevant as their beliefs.

Live your own fucking lives. They require more attention.

Those two pretty much summed up my thoughts.

12
General Discussion / Re: True or False?
« on: October 03, 2007, 12:35:52 PM »
How'd you find out about Emilio?

The next poster listens to techno.

13
General Discussion / Re: Decide
« on: September 30, 2007, 02:36:47 PM »
gmail

speakers or headphones

14
C&C: Renegade Servers / Re: Wil BC run the BI/BHS points fix?
« on: September 30, 2007, 02:35:26 PM »

i like what u said but the thing is that we have a time limit now. if this was on a maraton i wouldnt mindbut this isnt. and soo all the points one can get is worth it since you need points to win.. and look at it this way everyone, EVERYONE can do this it is just not limited to 4-5 ppl the whole team can do this and get points and vice versa.


But shouldn't the points reflect who is making more progress toward the ultimate goal which is destroying the base? Shooting tanks with a sniper rifle for 5 damage a shot is about as far from making progress as you can get. Why should that sniper get so many points when a raveshaw does 80 damage per shot and gets much less points? The raveshaw is much more effective at achieving the main goal which is dominating the enemy and winning by base destruction. It only makes sense he would get more points, but he doesn't because of this glitch (yea, i'm calling it a glitch) and this would "fix" that.

Imagine a basic soldier getting tons of points for shooting a building with his rifle. Yea, either team can do it, but it's unproductive and stupid. It shouldn't be rewarded.

15
C&C: Renegade Servers / Re: Wil BC run the BI/BHS points fix?
« on: September 30, 2007, 10:06:18 AM »
I think BC should run this. Snipers getting such disproportionate points compared to the damage they do to tanks has always been my biggest complaint about this game.

I'm actually surprised it has taken this long to make a fix. We don't participate in that ladder anyways, so that is all irrelevant. But as a stand alone fix, it seems like a no-brainer to me, Black Cell should definitely run this.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 72